Quantitative assessment of 2017-2018 Canadian air traffic and validation of air risk classes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, the Canadian airspace has experienced a significant rise in the deployment of remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) across various industries, from remote sensing to package delivery. To regulate these operations, TC has adapted the Specific Operations Risk Assessment (SORA) process [3], originally developed by the Joint Authorities for Rulemaking on Unmanned Systems (JARUS), to establish a structured risk assessment procedure for Canadian operators. This tailored process was released in Advisory Circular (AC) 903-001 [1], which primarily focuses on assessing risks associated with beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) operations in the Canadian airspace. The risk evaluation encompasses a thorough examination of operational airspace, accounting for factors such as airspace class and the expected frequency of encounters with traditional aviation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it