MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7084770823

Protocol-Specific Outcomes of GnRH Agonist Use in Luteal Phase Support During Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles

2025· article· en· W7084770823 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNonlinear Differential Equations Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLuteal phaseEmbryo transferAgonistEmbryoPregnancy rateMiscarriageLive birth
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anastasia Salame,1 Elias M Dahdouh,2 Mokhamad Zhaffal,3 Rania Al Jafari,1 Arya Muraleekrishnan,1 Aparna Bajpai,1 Shabin Kainoth,1 Bhavya Puliyali Koodathingal,1 David Samuel,1 Leyla Depret-Bixio,1 Michael Fakih1 1Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Fakih Fertility Centre, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates; 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada; 3Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Oasis Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab EmiratesCorrespondence: Anastasia Salame, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Fakih Fertility Centre, Al Markhaniyyah Abu Dhabi, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates, Tel +971543996368, Email dranastasiasalame@hotmail.comPurpose: Recent data comparing natural cycles and artificial cycles in frozen embryo transfer (FET) showed an equivalent LBR when optimized luteal phase support (LPS) was used. Of the suggested methods is the use of GnRH agonists as part of LPS. We aim to study whether the addition of GnRH agonists as LPS in FET cycles increases the live birth rate (LBR) and decreases the miscarriage rate (MR).Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for 140 FET cycles, which were divided into two groups. The study group in which a GnRH agonist was used (AG) at the time of embryo transfer included 66 cycles, whereas the control group (NAG) included 74 cycles in which the use of GnRH agonist was not described.Results: The implantation rate was greater in the AG (69/112 (61.6%) vs 60/124 (48.4%), p= 0.0413). The LBR was greater in the AG than in the CG but did not reach statistical significance (40/66 (60.6%) vs 35/74 (47.3%), p= 0.114). The MR was similar between the 2 groups (6/66 (10%) vs 5/74 (6.7%), p= 0.61). The subanalysis per FET protocol revealed that there was no difference in the LBR between the AG-medicated and NAG-medicated cycles (15/34 (44.62%) vs (36/65 (55.38%), p=0.1984) or between the AG-ovulation induction and NAG-ovulation induction FET cycles (21/32 (65.63%) vs 6/9 (66.67%), p=0.1985).Conclusion: The use of a GnRH agonist as an add-on for LPS in FET cycles numerically increased the LBR without reaching statistical significance despite significantly improving the implantation rate. MR were not affected. This potential beneficial effect was comparable between the artificial and ovulation-induction FET cycles.Keywords: GnRH agonist, frozen embryo transfer, live birth rate, luteal support, progesterone, miscarriage rate

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.334
GPT teacher head0.590
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it