Environmental Education: Household Solid Waste Problem in the Urban Site of Paripiranga-BA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Environmental education should be a continuous process, carried out in a formal and non-formal manner, seeking citizens' social and environmental awareness about a certain problem that affects society, caused by anthropic activities. Since man through these activities tends to generate environmental impacts, such as household solid waste: organic and inorganic, which are present in the generation of environmental impacts on the environment when not intended for recycling, causing soilcontamination, air , groundwater and river water. This article aims to demonstrate the actions taken to mitigate the household solid waste problem in the urban site of Paripiranga-Ba, made by trainees from Chemistry Degree course, in the development of Environmental Education activities in municipal schools: President Emílio Garrastazu Medici, Our Lady of Coité Educational Center and Professor Francisco de Paulo Abreu. The target audience (children, adolescents, youth and teachers) have been sensitized and instructed to carry the message to other family members and thus will be disseminating information about the correct procedures regarding waste separation and management. Be proactive in society, aware of the responsible citizens duties in household waste management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".