MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7086854890 · doi:10.13130/rd_unimi/wiud6w

Replication data for: “TAP-COG: Development and Preliminary Usability Evaluation of a New Tablet-Based Assessment of Cognitive Skills”

2025· dataset· en· W7086854890 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCognitive Abilities and Testing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUsabilityCognitionReplication (statistics)Cognitive walkthroughWeb usabilitySystem usability scaleUsability engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset contains anonymized data collected during the usability evaluation phase of the TAP-COG project, a tablet-based assessment of cognitive skills. The file includes demographic variables (age, gender, education, handedness, region of residence) and performance measures from the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and System Usability Scale (SUS). Personally identifying information has been removed to ensure participant confidentiality. This dataset accompanies the manuscript “TAP-COG: Development and Preliminary Usability Evaluation of a New Tablet-Based Assessment of Cognitive Skills” currently submitted for publication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCognitive Abilities and TestingFrench-language works237,207