MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7086874490 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15486644

Bi-Modal Emotion Recognition Dataset (RAVDESS + SAVEE + CREMA-D)

2025· dataset· en· W7086874490 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEmotion and Mood Recognition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneralizability theoryEmotion recognitionRobustness (evolution)Relevance (law)Class (philosophy)Emotion classificationEthnic group

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset is a visual (audio-video) resource created for bimodal emotion recognition. It is compiled from three major sources: CREMA-D (Crowd-sourced Emotional Multimodal Actors Dataset) RAVDESS (Ryerson Audio-Visual Database of Emotional Speech and Song) SAVEE (Surrey Audio-Visual Expressed Emotion) By integrating these databases, a comprehensive and diverse dataset was developed to improve the accuracy of bimodal emotion recognition systems. The resulting dataset includes audio-visual recordings of 119 actors (64 males and 55 females) representing various ethnic backgrounds and age groups. Initially, the dataset comprised 11,956 samples (6,371 from male actors and 5,585 from female actors) across seven emotion categories: Angry, Sad, Happy, Fearful, Surprised, Disgust, and Neutral. However, the dataset exhibited class imbalance, with certain emotions like "Surprised" being underrepresented. To address this imbalance, and to introduce natural variations in expression, data augmentation techniques were applied. This involved randomly selecting, duplicating, and modifying video samples from each class using methods such as pitch shifting and speed alteration. As a result, the dataset became class-balanced, containing a total of 14,257 files (7,482 from male and 6,775 from female actors). This extensive and diverse dataset improves real-world relevance by encompassing a wide range of actors, emotional expressions, ethnic diversity, and gender representation. It significantly strengthens the generalizability and robustness of emotion recognition models in practical applications. Insight of the Dataset train val test Total Total Files 10013 (5106 for Male, 4907 for Female) 2851 (1491 for Male, 1360 for Female) 1393 (880 for Male, 513 for Female) 14257 (7477 for Male, 6780 for Female) Total Actors 83 Actors (43 Male, 40 Female) 24 Actors (13 Male, 11 Female) 12 Actors (8 Male, 4 Female) 119 Actors (64 Male, 55 Female) Classwise Insights (Total Files) Training set Angry Disgust Fearful Happy Neutral Sad Surprised Male 765 705 772 777 703 768 616 Female 727 699 742 746 657 735 601 Total 1492 1404 1514 1523 1360 1503 1217 Validation set Angry Disgust Fearful Happy Neutral Sad Surprised Male 224 211 219 224 211 219 183 Female 203 190 198 203 190 198 178 Total 427 401 417 427 401 417 361 Testing set Angry Disgust Fearful Happy Neutral Sad Surprised Male 131 125 131 131 129 131 102 Female 74 67 74 74 62 74 88 Total 205 192 205 205 191 205 190 Overall Angry Disgust Fearful Happy Neutral Sad Surprised Male 1120 1041 1122 1132 1043 1118 901 Female 1004 956 1014 1023 909 1007 867 Total 2124 1997 2136 2155 1952 2125 1768

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1250.042

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicEmotion and Mood RecognitionFrench-language works237,207