MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7086975094 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17308094

Table 1 in New Canadian records and range expansion for Pterallastes thoracicus Loew (Diptera: Syrphidae)

2024· dataset· en· W7086975094 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicTiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTable (database)Range (aeronautics)Data collectionNature reserve

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Table 1. Plant survey of St. Williams conservation reserve collection points. Data were collected from a preliminary plant survey conducted 5 July 2024 at CNC2063425 (site A; 42° 42 0 06.12 00 N, 80° 26 0 56.4 00 W) and CNC2063425 (site B; 42° 42 0 03.3 00 N, 80° 26 0 50.4 00 W) collection sites SiteScientific name and authorityPlant familySite ASymplocarpus foetidus (Linnaeus) W. SalisburyAraceaeSite AEutrochium maculatum (Linnaeus) E.E. LamontAsteraceaeSite AEquisetum sp. LinneausEquisetaceaeSite ACornus sp. LinnaeusCornaceaeSite AElaeagnus sp. LinnaeusElaeagnaceaeSite AGeranium sp. LinnaeusGeraniaceaeSite AFraxinus sp. LinnaeusOleaceaeSite AOnoclea sensibilis LinnaeusOnocleaceaeSite ALysimachia ciliata LinnaeusPrimulaceaeSite AAnemone virginiana LinnaeusRanunculaceaeSite APhysocarpus sp. (Cambessèdes) RafinesqueRosaceaeSite AUlumus sp. LinnaeusUlmaceaeSite BCichorium intybus LinnaeusAsteraceaeSite BSolidago sp. LinnaeusAsteraceaeSite BSymphyotrichum spp. NeesAsteraceaeSite BElaeagnus sp. LinnaeusElaeagnaceaeSite BMelilotus albus MedikFabaceaeSite BLiriodendron tulipifera LinneausMagnoliaceaeSite BFraxinus sp. LinnaeusOleaceaeSite BPicea abies (Linnaeus) H. KarstenPinaceaeSite BVitis sp. LinnaeusVitaceae

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicTiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar CellsFrench-language works237,207