Strategic Needs for Sustainable Livestock Breeding in MENA Region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Livestock systems in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region are at a crossroads, challenged by climate stress, water scarcity, and fragmented development strategies. While the region has made significant investments in animal feeding infrastructure and animal health services, genetic improvement remains severely underutilized, despite its transformative potential for productivity and sustainability. This paper highlights the strategic need to reposition animal breeding as a central pillar of livestock development, particularly for small ruminants well-adapted to arid and semi-arid conditions. It argues for a shift from policies focused on flock or herd expansion to those that prioritize productivity improvement through selection, farmer empowerment, and value-added production systems. Through a structured, three-pronged approach, capacity building, formation of breed associations, and the establishment of a national livestock task force, the MENA region can close the productivity gap, enhance food security, and preserve its unique genetic resources. The paper draws on scientific evidence, practical examples, and institutional models (e.g., ANOC in Morocco) to propose a scalable roadmap for sustainable livestock improvement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".