Measures to strengthen the identity and professionalism of social workers in correctional welfare practice
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to diagnose the identity and professionalism of social workers working in Korean correctional settings and to suggest comprehensive measures for institutionalizing correctional social workers and strengthening their capabilities. Through literature review and comparison of domestic and foreign systems, it was confirmed that the participation of Korean social workers in correctional welfare is very limited due to legal and structural limitations. On the other hand, in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Japan, correctional social workers are leading the prevention of recidivism and social reintegration as core members of multidisciplinary teams. As a result of the study, it was suggested that the following measures are essential for Korean social workers to strengthen their identity and professionalism as correctional social workers: first, improvement of policies and systems; second, establishment of education, training, and supervision systems; third, strengthening of multidisciplinary and community-based platforms; fourth, establishment of evidence-based practices and performance evaluation indicators; and fifth, establishment of a professional culture based on ethics and values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it