MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Creepy Creepers: Planty Animacy in the Ecogothic Landscape

2025· article· en· W7087396835 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuePreternature Critical and Historical Studies on the Preternatural · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnimacyUncannyPosthumanUncanny valleySpace (punctuation)SituatedZombieConsciousness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The animacy of plants stands in the neglected posthuman borderland between the “turn to animals” and the “turn to things.” Situated on an “animacy hierarchy” betwixt and between animals and things, plants are perhaps more involved in human acts of placemaking than animals. But no plants are more “animate” than the creepers, climbers, and twiners whose uncanny animacy so fascinated Darwin that he kept such a vine in his study to study its movements. In ecogothic contexts, plants move from passive markers of setting (the ecogothic uses creepers like ivy to demarcate the hauntable space of the gothic ruin) to becoming active participants in the unfolding drama, serving as antagonists to the intrepid human explorer in the imperial ecogothic, to serving in the conventional role of poltergeists in the haunted house narrative, to finally becoming active agents of murder in botanical horror.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score0.541

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePreternature Critical and Historical Studies on the PreternaturalSame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207