MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Building geometry-aware lifecycle optimization of hybrid renewable energy systems with solid gravity storage

2025· article· en· W7087713755 on OpenAlexafffundabout

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Energy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlliance de recherche numérique du Canada
KeywordsCost of electricity by sourceRenewable energyPayback periodWind powerPhotovoltaic systemGridElectricityElectricity generationHybrid system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urban buildings face challenges in integrating intermittent-supply renewable electricity sources while conforming to space and economic constraints. Solid gravity energy storage (GS) has not yet been explored in building applications despite its mechanical simplicity and long lifespan. The current literature lacks studies that link GS' optimal capacity to building geometry and energy intensity. This study introduces a novel hybrid energy system for buildings that combines façade-mounted PV panels, small rooftop wind turbines, Li-Ion batteries, and a rope-hoist-based GS. A multi-objective optimization framework is developed to minimize both the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and grid dependency (GD), considering realistic dispatch logic and annual operation. The system is optimized for 625 parametric building designs covering different energy use intensities (EUI) and geometric configurations, defined by façade area-to-volume, length-to-width, and height-to-footprint ratios. Tradeoff solutions achieved LCOE values between 0.051 and 0.111 USD/kWh, and GD between 0.195 and 0.888. GS was found to be the most impactful component on system autonomy, with the ratio between its capacity and the building's average daily demand ranging from 0.0 to 1.0 and strongly correlating with GD. Most optimal designs used PV extensively, wind turbines moderately, and batteries minimally. Payback periods ranged from 9 to 17 years, and carbon intensity values remained mostly below the Canadian average. Overall, the study highlights the synergy between the building design and the extent to which GS, as well as solar and wind systems, should be sized, hence offering a practical direction for low-carbon and resilient buildings. • A novel gravity storage system is proposed for urban building energy systems. • Renewable sources and storage units are optimized for different buildings. • Gravity storage size strongly impacts grid independence across building designs. • LCOE values range from 0.051 to 0.111 USD/kWh across 625 building designs. • Trade-off designs achieve low carbon intensity and competitive electricity costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied EnergySame topicColorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionFrench-language works237,207