MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7088230939 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17319937

Murina suilla

2025· article· en· W7088230939 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPrimate Behavior and Ecology
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ontario Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDorsumGenusKey (lock)Taxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Murina suilla (Temminck, 1840). Tables 1, 2A, 2B Murina tubinaris: Palawan: Esselstyn et al. 2004: 271, 278, 288, 289, 296. Specimens examined from Philippines. FMNH 230253, field number DSB 11108, ♀; FMNH 230254, field number DSB 11170, ♀, collected 1.40 km N, 2.75 km W. Mt Tallulah peak on Mindoro Island, Sablayan Municipality, Occidental Mindoro Prov., Mindoro Island (12.80287 N, 120.96232 E, elevation 490 m) (Fig.1). Description. Fur on the dorsum is grey at the base with pale mid band and dark brown tips. Ventrally this species is unicolour buff on the mid-belly and bicoloured laterally with grey-based hairs and dark brown tips. Wings are dark brown in colour. Tail membrane is hairy, especially along the tail vertebrae. Conformation of upper and lower molars typical of M. suilla without reduced mesostyles on M 1 and M 2 and large talonids on M 1 and M 2 (Figs. 3A, B). See Tables 1 and 2A, 2B for selected external and skull measurements. Comparison with M. philippinensis. M. suilla from Mindoro has darker wings, more hairy tail membrane, and differs in colour, having dark brown tips dorsally and dark tips on the lateral portions of the belly. M. philippinensis is reddish brown dorsally and buff coloured ventrally. Although the two species differ in colour, they share the dorsal tri-coloured banding pattern and tooth morphology. Size comparisons given above. Other Records. Murina cf. suilla Palawan: (9 27 48 N, 118 32 16 E) was caught at the ‘‘rain forestation’’ site in Sitio Kandis, Aborlan Municipality, in forest/grassland mosaic at ca. 40 m, about seven km away from the next good secondary forest in the foothills of the Victoria Range (Esselstyn et al. 2004). Esselstyn et al. (2004) recorded this specimen (Staatliches Museum fur Naturkunde Stuttgart SMNS 49238) as Murina cf tubinaris from Palawan and although the identification of this specimen cannot be confirmed, it is more likely to be M. suilla than M. tubinaris. M. tubinaris is now referred to as M. feae (see Francis & Eger 2012; holotype from Myanmar). Records of M. feae are restricted to mainland SE Asia, from India to China. Similar to M. suilla, M. feae has tricoloured fur dorsally and bicoloured fur ventrally. The holotype of M. suilla is from Java. Specimens from Java and Borneo are small (FA 29–30 range), whereas the two Mindoro specimens are larger (FA 33–34), similar in size to the Palawan specimen. Identification of the specimen from Palawan should be regarded as provisional. We make the species assignment primarily based on the presence of M. suilla on Borneo and Mindoro, which lie at either end of Palawan. Also, it should be noted that Palawan has none of the endemic species of pteropodids that are otherwise restricted to the oceanic islands of the Philippines (Heaney, 1991; Esselstyn et al. 2004), so that finding M. philippinensis on Palawan would be surprising. Further investigation is warranted. Ecology. M. suilla was captured on Mindoro Island in regenerating lowland dipterocarp forest (490 m) with a dense ground cover of ferns, gingers, and giant taro (Alocasia sp.). Two females were captured in February, and one was pregnant. Both were captured in mist nets. Genetic Analyses. Cytochrome b and DBY sequences are available on GenBank for specimens listed in Appendices 2 and 3. Relative divergences among Philippine species is discussed below.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPrimate Behavior and EcologyFrench-language works237,207