Glissandra oviformis n. sp.: A novel predatory flagellate illuminates the character evolution within the eukaryotic clade CRuMs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Culturing protists offers a powerful approach to exploring eukaryotic diversity, especially for deep-branching lineages. In this study, we cultured and described a novel protist species, named Glissandra oviformis n sp., within the poorly studied and unclassified genus Glissandra. While an SSU rDNA gene phylogeny failed to resolve its phylogenetic placement in the eukaryotic tree, a phylogenomic analysis of 340 proteins indicated G. oviformis as a deep-branching member of the CRuMs clade. Prior to this study, this clade consisted of diverse heterotrophic amoeba and flagellates and lacks clear synapomorphies. Ultrastructural observations revealed that G. oviformis shares the characteristics with some CRuMs members, including the pellicle underlying the plasma membrane and an internal sleeve surrounding the central pair of the axoneme at the flagellar transitional region. Our findings suggest potential shared characteristics and synapomorphies for CRuMs and contribute to a deeper understanding of the character evolution within CRuMs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".