EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHY AS A TOOL FOR ENHANCING NATIONAL STABILITY IN NIGERIA'S INSECURITY AND ECONOMIC CRISIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper appraised the teacher as the millennium nation builder and reveals that his role is invaluable and immeasurable. Security as pointed out by this paper is the condition of safety, freedom from danger and defense from physical harm. The paper logically stated that human beings blossom in security and is spontaneously determined by the need to maximize available resources to guarantee their physical, physiological and psychological welfare. This implies that security is not only restricted to protection from physical harm. Security also involves existence of environmental factors that instill peace of mind in an individual in order to empower him to function in the society effectively. It also thrashed out that only the state has the capability to assure security and save society from lawlessness. In the paper as well, insecurity is conceived as a situation where human and national security of a state is compromised by internal forces aggravated by ignorance, unemployment, poverty, poor economic conditions, corruption, treacherous politicians, inadequate security personnel, etc. The paper furthermore elucidate how those invaluable and immeasurable teacher’s roles will facilitate in combating incessant kidnapping, banditry, cattle rustling, herders/farmers clashes and any other security and economic challenges. Finally, recommendations were made on to address the issues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".