MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7090756831 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17352004

Weighted Equation of State samples for "Nonparametric extensions of nuclear equations of state: Probing the breakdown scale of relativistic mean-field theory"

2025· dataset· en· W7090756831 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEquation of stateDimensionless quantityState (computer science)Scale (ratio)Moment (physics)Nonparametric statisticsEnergy (signal processing)Lambda

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonparametric equation of state samples for 6 different choices of transition pressure for "Nonparametric extensions of nuclear equations of state: Probing the breakdown scale of relativistic mean-field theory". See the README.md for more details. Each hdf5 file contains 30,000 equation of state samples for each choice of transition pressure, and astrophysical weights which correspond to the astrophysical likelihood of the given equation of state from joint gravitational-wave, x-ray pulse-profile, and radio timing measurements of neutron star masses, radii, and tidal deformabilities. For each equation of state, we provide tabulated pressure, energy density, baryon rest-mass density and speed of sound. We also provide sequences of TOV solutions for different central pressures, including the mass, radius, dimensionless tidal deformability, and moment of inertia. See the README.md for more details.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.045

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research→French-language works237,207→