Bibliographic record
Abstract
Heterotoma planicornis (Pallas, 1772) Figs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Cimex planicornis Pallas, 1772: 23. (original description). Cimex spissicornis Fabricius, 1777: 300 (original description). Synonymized by Costa (1843: 55). Acanthia crassicornis Fabricius, 1794: 70 (original description). Synonymized by Reuter (1888: 667). Cimex crassipennis Turton, 1802: 609 (new name for Cimex crassicornis). Synonymized by Reuter (1888: 667). Heterotoma acinaciformis Costa, 1839: 20 (original description). Synonymized by Wagner (1968: 185), tentatively. Heterotoma planicornis: Tamanini (1962: 136) (diagnosis, description); Schuh (1995: 121) (catalog); Kerzhner and Josifov (1999: 248) (catalog); Schuh (2002–2013) (online catalog); Kment and Bryja (2006: 11) (redescription, figures, neotype designation, distribution, biology); Kment and Bryja (2012: 117) (correction); Aukema (2018) (online catalog). Diagnosis. This species can be distinguished by the combination of the following characters: dorsum covered with brown, suberect setae and pale, reclining sericeous setae (Figs 1 A – E, 2 A, D); antennal segment blackish brown, segments I and II densely covered with fuscous, suberect setae; segment II thick and elongated, somewhat flattened (Figs 1 A – E, 2 A – F); segments III and IV short, thin, and linear, basally pale; hemelytra entirely dark brown; labium reaching mesocoxae; femora pale green, without dark or reddish tinge; tibiae yellowish green, subbasally tinged with green; tarsus yellowish green, widely darkened at segments I and III; pygophore with one elongated, pointed-end structure and short, bifurcate structure (Fig. 3 A – C); male endosoma with two elongated, apically spinulate sclerites and thick and smooth, pointed-end basal sclerite (Fig. 4 A – D); sensory lobe of left paramere with thick structure covered with stiff setae, hypophysis with minute, hook-like structure (Fig. 4 E – G); sensory lobe of right paramere moderately curved and laterally with two dentation, hypophysis stout, apically blunt (Fig. 4 H – J); female genitalia with thick sclerotized ring (Fig. 5 A – C); interramal lobe spinulate, bifurcate proximally (Fig. 5 D, E). For more diagnostic characters and figures, see Tamanini (1962, 1981) and Kment and Bryja (2006, 2012). Measurements. Male (n = 5) / Female (n = 2). Total body length 4.45–5.00 / 4.75–4.85; head width across eyes 0.79–0.84 / 0.83–0.85; vertex width 0.33–0.36 / 0.35–0.39; lengths of antennal segments I – IV 0.53–0.59, 1.66–1.79, 0.49–0.53, 0.42–0.47 / 0.54–0.55, 1.64–1.70, 0.49–0.50, 0.44; labial length 1.57–1.63 / 1.53–1.65; mesal pronotal length including collar 0.63–0.71 / 0.61–0.62; basal pronotal width 1.01–1.12 / 1.04–1.10; width across hemelytron 1.28–1.39 / 1.39–1.63; cuneal length 0.69–0.88 / 0.76–0.78; cuneal width 0.33–0.39 / 0.33–0.35; lengths of metafemur, tibia, and tarsus 1.49–1.66, 2.05–2.40, 0.47–0.55 / 1.56–1.65, 2.13–2.22, 0.53–0.54. Distribution. Europe: most of the territory. Asia: Türkiye, South Korea (introduced) (new record). North America: Canada, USA (Wheeler and Henry 1992; Kerzhner and Josifov 1999; Kment and Bryja 2006) (introduced). Biology. This species exhibits a wide host range, feeding on plants from 12 angiosperm families (Kment and Bryja 2006). Our observations revealed that the Korean population inhabits Spiraea japonica (Rosaceae) (Fig. 1 F). The habitat of H. planicornis discovered in this study was limited to narrow artificial landscapes in urbanized areas, excluding larger available natural habitats such as parks. Material examined. South Korea, Seoul: 5 ♂, 1 ♀, near Hannam station, Dokseodang-ro 6, Yongsan-gu, on Spiraea japonica 3. vi. 2024, Soojeong Cho (SNU); 1 ♀, ditto, 17. vi. 2023, Soojeong Cho (SNU); 1 ♂, ditto, 5. vi. 2024, Minsuk Oh (NIBR).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".