MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7091295907 · doi:10.1016/j.est.2025.118860

Correlation-aware kernel selection for multi-scale feature fusion of convolutional neural networks in multivariate and multi-step time series forecasting: Application to Li-ion battery state of health forecasting

2025· article· en· W7091295907 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Energy Storage · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeries (stratigraphy)Feature selectionSelection (genetic algorithm)Convolutional neural networkMultivariate statisticsTime seriesKernel (algebra)Pattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proper forecasting of the State of Health (SOH) of lithium-ion batteries is crucial for enhancing performance, ensuring safety, and prolonging the lifespan of energy storage systems, particularly in electric vehicles and renewable energy applications. This study develops a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) that incorporates multi-scale feature fusion to extract multi-resolution patterns through a correlation-aware, multi-scale kernel selection mechanism for multivariate and multi-step time series forecasting of battery SOH. The system includes two main parts: Preprocessing and modeling. The preprocessing of the raw battery data includes time series features extraction across statistical, temporal, and frequency domains; normalizing the data; and employing hybrid feature selection that utilizes both filter-based and wrapper-based methods. In the modeling part, the proposed CNN architecture is developed. This model includes a novel approach of determining adaptive kernel sizes that are established through cross-correlation of the input features, enabling the model to identify short-, medium-, and long-term patterns. Extensive experiments carried out on benchmark datasets provided by NASA and a commercial battery testing facility showcase the model's advantages compared to conventional CNNs, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, fully connected neural networks (LNNs), and two combinations of LSTM and CNN. The suggested approach consistently results in notably reduced prediction errors and demonstrates greater robustness throughout repeated trials, affirming its promise as a dependable solution for practical battery prognostics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score0.609

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Energy StorageSame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207