MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7092105871 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17362566

Modeling Temperature-Dependent Phase Mismatch in KTP Crystal: An Open-Source Computational Toolkit

2025· other· en· W7092105871 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotorefractive and Nonlinear Optics
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGaussianThermal conductivityCode (set theory)Phase (matter)ThermalPulse (music)Temperature measurement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an open-source toolkit for modeling thermally induced phase mismatching (TIPM) in KTP under repetitively pulsed Gaussian pumping, where refractive indices change with temperature rise. The code solves the heat equation with temperature-dependent thermal conductivity and realistic cooling via conduction, convection, and radiation. It then computes the phase mismatch using experimental thermal-dispersion relations of KTP in a type-II configuration, takes Gaussian spatial and temporal pump profiles as inputs, and returns spatiotemporal temperature fields along with TIPM evolution versus pulse number. The toolkit consolidates a previously published numerical procedure into a versioned implementation that faithfully reproduces the accumulative temperature behavior and reverse-sign TIPM as pulses increase. The implementation also reproduces the fluctuations in temperature and TIPM attributed to the off-time between successive pulses and runs efficiently on personal computers as reported in the original study. The toolkit is available as an open-source GitHub repository and is released under the MIT license as version v1.0.1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPhotorefractive and Nonlinear OpticsFrench-language works237,207