MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7092189809 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17371836

REM_UQ_EXTREME

2025· dataset· en· W7092189809 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidualWatershedFlood mythFlood forecastingHydrological modellingStreamflowHydrology (agriculture)Uncertainty analysisFlash flood

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This repository contains the code and data for the paper "An Uncertainty Quantification Framework for Simulation-based Flood Frequency Analysis" by Romero-Cuellar et al. (2025, submitted to Water Resources Research).The UQ-flood framework integrates process-based hydrological modeling, stochastic weather generation, and residual error modeling to provide robust flood frequency estimates with quantified uncertainty. Key Features Process-based hydrologic modeling using HBV-EC within the Raven framework Residual Error Model (REM) for uncertainty quantification at annual maxima scale Stochastic weather generation using CoSMoS for long-term climate simulation Comparative analysis against traditional statistical FFA methods (GEV distribution) Modular framework applicable to diverse watershed conditions Case Study: Black River Watershed The primary case study focuses on the Black River near Washago, Ontario (Water Survey of Canada gauge 02EC002), featuring: Watershed area: 1,506 km² Streamflow record: 100+ years (1916–present) Mixed hydrologic regime (nival fraction ≈ 0.7) Minimal anthropogenic regulation Quick Start Prerequisites R (version 4.0 or higher) Required R packages (see Installation section) Installation Clone the repository: git clone https://github.com/rarabzad/REM_UQ_EXTREME.git cd UQ-flood Install required R packages by running the package installation section in MasterScriptRepro.R. Basic Usage Run the master script to reproduce the analysis: source("src/MasterScriptRepro.R") This will: Load and preprocess the data Calibrate the hydrological model Set up the residual error model Generate stochastic weather sequences Perform flood frequency analysis Generate comparative plots and results Methodology The UQ-flood framework consists of three main components: 1. Hydrological Model (HBV-EC) Lumped conceptual model implemented in Raven Calibrated using Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) objective function Simulates snow accumulation/melt, soil moisture, and runoff generation 2. Residual Error Model (REM) Box-Cox transformation (λ=0.2) with AR(1) structure Flow-dependent error mean Developed specifically for annual maximum flows Generates probabilistic streamflow ensembles 3. Stochastic Weather Generator (CoSMoS) Multivariate non-Gaussian time series simulation Preserves marginal distributions and autocorrelation structures Generates 10,000+ years of synthetic climate data Key Results The framework demonstrates: Reduced uncertainty: Narrower confidence intervals compared to traditional FFA Data efficiency: Reliable estimates with only 30 years of data Bias correction: Effective mitigation of systematic model errors Process consistency: Physically-based uncertainty quantification Outputs The analysis generates several key outputs: Flood frequency curves with uncertainty bounds Comparative plots between UQ-flood and traditional methods Performance metrics (KGE, NSE, PBIAS, CRPS) Uncertainty quantification (95% prediction intervals) File Descriptions Data Files blackriver_results.RData: Results object with model outputs, REM parameters, and analysis results ForcingFunctions.csv: Historical meteorological data (precipitation, temperature) Hydrographs_baseline.csv: Observed and simulated streamflow for calibration Hydrographs_longterm.csv: Long-term simulation results (10,000 years) Code Files MasterScriptRepro.R: Main reproduction script with complete workflow Citation If you use this code or data in your research, please cite: @article{romerocuellar2025uqflood, title={An Uncertainty Quantification Framework for Simulation-based Flood Frequency Analysis}, author={Romero-Cuellar, Jonathan and Craig, James R. and Tolson, Bryan A. and Arabzadeh, Rezgar}, journal={Water Resources Research}, year={2025}, note={submitted} } License This project is licensed under the MIT License - see the LICENSE file for details. Acknowledgments [tentative] This research was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the University of Waterloo Contact Jonathan Romero-Cuellar: jromeroc@uwaterloo.ca (corresponding author)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0060.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3150.316

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies→French-language works237,207→