MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7092191315 · doi:10.35765/hp.2825

Intra-industry Trade of the EU, USMCA, and their Member States in the Period 2000–2022 – Does Economic Integration Matter?

2025· article· W7092191315 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHoryzonty Polityki · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMember statesEconomic integrationEuropean unionEu countriesEuropean integrationEmpirical researchRegional integrationPeriod (music)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to identify the similarities and differences between intra-industry trade (IIT) of European Union and IIT of United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) and their member states. Moreover, we answer the question if more advanced economic integration goes together with more intensive IIT. THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: We conducted an analysis of IIT disaggregated into 6-digit HS codes using the UN Comtrade database, and employed Grubel-Lloyd indices. We aggregated GL indices for selected countries and selected blocs of countries (here the EU and USMCA) and for the world. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: We chose the EU and USMCA as examples of correlations between economic integration and intra-industry trade because they are some of the most important RTAs in the world and their members fulfil conditions for intensive IIT. We verify the hypothesis that sharing membership in such a grouping is an important factor intensifying bilateral IIT. RESEARCH RESULTS: We have shown that EU IIT shares were considerably higher than those in the case of the USMCA, and the advantage of the EU grew over time. Our empirical study confirms that sharing membership in RTA bloc is an important factor intensifying bilateral IIT. Also, more advanced integration of adjacent countries, especially those that differ little with respect to economic potential, wealth, and culture, helps to increase IIT shares. CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: We compare the IIT characteristics of the EU and its member states with those of the USMCA bloc and its members in a relatively long and turbulent period (2000–2022). To the best of our knowledge, there was no such analysis of world IIT during this period. Moreover, the correlation between the intensity of intra-industry trade and the advancement of economic integration has not been studied in literature very often.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHoryzonty PolitykiSame topicGlobal trade and economicsFrench-language works237,207