MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7092191315 · doi:10.35765/hp.2825

Intra-industry Trade of the EU, USMCA, and their Member States in the Period 2000–2022 – Does Economic Integration Matter?

2025· article· W7092191315 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHoryzonty Polityki · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMember statesEconomic integrationEuropean unionEu countriesEuropean integrationEmpirical researchRegional integrationPeriod (music)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to identify the similarities and differences between intra-industry trade (IIT) of European Union and IIT of United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) and their member states. Moreover, we answer the question if more advanced economic integration goes together with more intensive IIT. THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: We conducted an analysis of IIT disaggregated into 6-digit HS codes using the UN Comtrade database, and employed Grubel-Lloyd indices. We aggregated GL indices for selected countries and selected blocs of countries (here the EU and USMCA) and for the world. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: We chose the EU and USMCA as examples of correlations between economic integration and intra-industry trade because they are some of the most important RTAs in the world and their members fulfil conditions for intensive IIT. We verify the hypothesis that sharing membership in such a grouping is an important factor intensifying bilateral IIT. RESEARCH RESULTS: We have shown that EU IIT shares were considerably higher than those in the case of the USMCA, and the advantage of the EU grew over time. Our empirical study confirms that sharing membership in RTA bloc is an important factor intensifying bilateral IIT. Also, more advanced integration of adjacent countries, especially those that differ little with respect to economic potential, wealth, and culture, helps to increase IIT shares. CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: We compare the IIT characteristics of the EU and its member states with those of the USMCA bloc and its members in a relatively long and turbulent period (2000–2022). To the best of our knowledge, there was no such analysis of world IIT during this period. Moreover, the correlation between the intensity of intra-industry trade and the advancement of economic integration has not been studied in literature very often.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it