MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7092205149 · doi:10.1145/3725843.3756105

TransFusion: End-to-End Transformer Acceleration via Graph Fusion and Pipelining

2025· article· W7092205149 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformerGraphFusionAccelerationMinification

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transformer acceleration has increasingly emphasized local fusion within isolated submodules, such as multi-head attention (MHA) and softmax.However, as Transformer models continue to scale in both depth and context length, such fragmented optimizations fail to address end-to-end inefficiencies across the full encoder/decoder stack.This paper presents TransFusion, a comprehensive framework for end-to-end Transformer layers, including QKV projections, MHA, LayerNorm, and FFN, as structured Einsum Cascades, enabling precise modelling of data dependencies and execution order.TransFusion introduces DPipe, a unified graph-based scheduler that partitions the Einsum-centric directed acyclic graph (DAG) and applies latency-aware pipelining across hardware hierarchies using dynamic programming (DP).To enable scalable execution under strict memory budgets, TransFusion integrates TileSeek, a Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS)-based tiling search algorithm that balances buffer reuse and system constraints.Evaluated across both cloud and edge architecture, TransFusion achieves up to an average of 1.6× speedup on cloud and 2.2× on edge over the prior state-of-the-art, FuseMax, by jointly optimizing inter-layer data reuse, intra-layer pipelining, and operator scheduling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Graph Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207