Towards highway design readiness for vehicle automation: a 3D risk assessment approach using reliability theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Empirical quantification of how autonomous driving will affect road safety, particularly whether current road designs can accommodate autonomous vehicles (AV), remains under-researched. This research addresses the gap by proposing a three-dimensional (3D) risk assessment framework that integrates reliability theory and mobile Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) scans, focusing on how sight distance limitations interact with vehicle autonomy. Using data from 308 curves along a rural highway in British Columbia, Canada, the framework was applied in three phases. First, a voxel-based 3D LiDAR method was developed to estimate available sight distance (ASD) in complex terrain, with results compared against traditional two-dimensional (2D) methods. Second, three vehicle types were defined to represent different automation levels, including human-driven vehicles (HDV), transition-stage AVs, and fully developed AVs, followed by a reliability-based risk assessment comparing ASD with stopping sight distance (SSD) required by these vehicles. The resulting probability of non-compliance (Pnc) served as a quantitative measure of design risk from insufficient sight distance. Finally, sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore how operational parameters and sensor configurations influence highway design risk levels. The research found that the 3D method provided a more accurate, location-sensitive evaluation of ASD, while the 2D method often overestimated sight distance, especially on combined horizontal and vertical curves. The 3D-based risk assessment indicated an overall reduction in risk with increasing automation, although some cases showed higher risk for fully developed AVs. Segment- and curve-level analyses showed that fully developed AVs face higher risks on sharp curves with limited visibility due to assumptions of strict speed compliance and comfort-based braking rates. Sensitivity analysis showed that increasing deceleration rates can substantially reduce AV risks, while raising sensor height offers limited benefits. This integrated framework highlights the value of combining LiDAR technology and reliability theory for estimating Pnc as a 3D risk index. P𝚗c can guide manufacturers in adjusting operating parameters (e.g., speed and braking rates) or provide targeted system training at high-risk locations, while also helping road agencies prioritize design improvements to support road infrastructure readiness and safer transitions to full driving automation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".