MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7092291121 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17379444

Rhabdophis nuchalis

2025· article· W7092291121 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ontario Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDorsumOrange (colour)Species identificationVenMaxillary canine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the available literature (Nguyen & David 2023; Liu et al. 2023) and our own material, we here propose the following provisional identification key to the species of the Rhabdophis nuchalis group species: 1a. Dorsal scale rows 15–15–15............................................................................. 3 1b. Dorsal scale rows 17–17 (15, 16)–15..................................................................... 2 2a. Ventrals 136–151; infralabials 7; temporals 1+2; maxillary teeth 25................................... R. hmongorum 2b. Ventrals 151–157; infralabials 8; temporals 1+1; maxillary teeth 19.............................. R. leonardi complex 3a. Usually supralabials 5.................................................................................. 4 3b. Usually supralabials 6.................................................................................. 5 4a. Dorsum green; venter pale............................................................. R. pentasupralabialis 4b. Dorsum brown; venter dark...................................................................... R. chiwen 5a. Black line present below the eye and extending onto the last two supralabials..................................... 6 5b. Black line absent below eye and on last two supralabials.......................................... R. kaiyuanensis 6a. Distinct mark present on nape........................................................................... 7 6b. Nape without V-shaped black patches............................................................. R. nuchalis 7a. TEM usually 1+1; VEN 118–127; SC 38–47; nape grey with an orange V-shaped zone behind the black collar; faint dorsolateral cross-bars present............................................................................ .. R. angeli 7b. TEM usually 1+2; VEN 124–165; SC 44–74; nape reddish-brown before the black collar, without an orange V-shaped zone; dorsolateral cross-bars absent.................................................................. R. swinhonis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicParasite Biology and Host Interactions→French-language works237,207→