MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7092293057 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2025.3622931

Channel Modeling for Molecular Communication With Heterogeneous Circular/Spherical Boundary

2025· article· W7092293057 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Communication and Nanonetworks
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBoundary (topology)Boundary value problemMolecular communicationChannel (broadcasting)Bounded functionImpulse (physics)Impulse response

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Geometry is a key factor in channel modeling for molecular communication (MC), especially when considering its potential for enabling intrabody networks and healthcare applications. Driven by the complex geometries within biological entities, this paper proposes modeling the channel for an MC via diffusion (MCvD) system in bounded circular and spherical environments with a heterogeneous boundary. Specifically, the boundary comprises fully reflecting and absorbing portions, with properties that depend on the presence of absorbing receptors (APs). Moreover, the characteristics of the APs, such as their number, size, and spatial distribution, are variable to better align with realistic boundary conditions. To obtain an accurate channel impulse response (CIR), we employ the homogenization technique to convert the mixed Dirichlet-Neumann boundary into a Robin boundary. Accordingly, we derive a valid CIR expression for the bounded MCvD system, accommodating confined spaces with APs of arbitrary sizes, numbers, and locations. Numerical results based on particle-based simulations validate our analysis. Finally, we investigate the error performance of the MCvD system under various boundary conditions. Simulation results show that a heterogeneous boundary with appropriate parameters has the potential to achieve pulse shaping of the CIR and enhance the performance of point-to-point MCvD systems in both 2D and 3D environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicMolecular Communication and NanonetworksFrench-language works237,207