MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7092293895 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2025.3622963

Fluid Antenna Index Modulation for MIMO Systems: Robust Transmission and Low-Complexity Detection

2025· article· en· W7092293895 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)DetectorMIMOSpectral efficiencySpatial modulationBit error rateUpper and lower boundsTransmission (telecommunications)Transmission system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fluid antenna (FA) index modulation (IM)-enabled multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) system, referred to as FA-IM, significantly improves spectral efficiency (SE) compared to conventional systems. However, the system does not account for spatial correlation, which significantly affects performance. To address this issue, this paper proposes an innovative FA grouping-based IM (FAG-IM) system by redesigning the mapping of bits to port indices. Specifically, FA ports are allocated into multiple groups, with each group independently performing port IM and symbol modulation. To enhance robustness against spatial correlation, a block grouping scheme is proposed, in which adjacent ports are assigned to the same group. Then, the upper bound of the average bit error probability (ABEP) for the proposed system is derived. Furthermore, exploiting the signal structure of the FAG-IM system, a low-complexity detector is developed within the approximate message passing (AMP) framework. The simulation results confirm that the proposed FAG-IM system outperforms existing systems, demonstrating excellent robustness against spatial correlation. Additionally, the results indicate that the proposed detector achieves superior performance with low complexity, thereby facilitating the implementation of the FAG-IM system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.963

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207