MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7092294212 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17379442

Rhabdophis angeli

2025· article· W7092294212 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ontario Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAltitude (triangle)NatrixTable (database)Night vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rhabdophis angeli (Bourret 1934) (Figs. 1–2, 4A–C; Table 2) Natrix (Rhabdophis) angeli Bourret, 1934: 151. Holotype: MNHN-RA-1938.0123, adult female, collected by R. Bourret on January 1, 1929. Type locality: “ Tam-Dao, Tong-King (60 km au Nord-Est d’Hanoï)”, now Tam Dao National Park, Phu Tho Province, Vietnam. Rhabdophis angeli — Bourret (1935: 4); Bourret (1936: 102); Orlov et al. (2000: 73); Nguyen et al. (2009: 365); Wallach et al. (2014: 633); Poyarkov et al. (2023: 359). Natrix angeli — Smith (1943: 300). Rhabdophis guangdongensis Zhu, Wang, Takeuchi & Zhao, 2014: 473, Fig. 2A–B, 3A–C. Holotype: SYS r000018, adult female, collected by Y.Y. Wang on May 26, 2008. Type locality: Aizhai Village, Renhua County, Guangdong Province, China (4°56'16.58"N, 113°39'57.82"N; altitude 132 m asl) Rhabdophis guangdongensis — Che et al. (2020: 721); Zhu et al. (2020: 108–119); Qin et al. (2023: 107893); Nguyen & David (2023: 224–236, in part); Jiang et al. (2025, Appendix I). Rhabdophis cf. guangdongensis —Poyarkov et al. (2023: 360, in part). Specimens examined (n = 4, all from the type locality of Rhabdophis angeli in Tam Dao NP, Phu Tho Province, Vietnam): MNHN-RA-1938.0123 (adult female, holotype) collected on January 1, 1929, by R. Bourret; MNHN-RA-1935.0059 (adult male) collected in 1935 by R. L. Bourret; MNHN-RA-1958.0463 (adult male) collected in 1958 by R. L. Bourret; ROM 34577 (adult female) collected by N.L. Orlov in 1977 (altitude 900 m asl). Referred material from the literature (n = 6, all from Guangdong Province, China). SYS r00018 (Holotype of Rhabdophis guangdongensis) from Aizhai Village, Renhua County (4°56'16.58"N, 113°39'57.82"E; altitude 132 m asl) collected by Y.Y. Wang on May 26, 2008 (data from Zhu et al. 2014). SICAU 20160801-91 (adult male) and SICAU 201509013-305 (adult female) from Mt. Wutong, Shenzhen County; ZL-RG-2018-0421 (adult female) from Mt. Nankun, Huizhou County; ZL-RG- 2014-4-10 (adult female) from Mt. Yinping, Dongguan County; and ZL-RG-2017-0423 (adult female) from Mt. Tianjing, Shaoguan County (data from Zhu et al. 2020). Revised diagnosis. Rhabdophis angeli can be diagnosed by the combination of the following characters: (1) head well distinct from the neck; (2) maxillary teeth 20–23, the posterior-most two or three teeth abruptly enlarged, not grooved, and not separated by diastema from the rest of the series; (3) supralabials six (rarely five), the third and fourth touching the eye; (4) seven or eight infralabials, the first four in contact with anterior chin shields; (5) dorsal scales in 15 rows throughout, feebly keeled, the outer row smooth; (6) ventrals 118–127; (7) subcaudals 38–47; (8) top of head, occiput, and nape (anterior to the black collar) grey; (9) a broad black collar, posteriorly bordered by a reverse V-shaped orange mark on the nape; (10) dorsal surface of body and tail brownish-grey, bearing narrow black cross-bars; (11) body and tail each with two dorsolateral longitudinal brownish-red lines, each line accompanied by a series of white spots within the cross-bars; (12) lips bearing two conspicuous black oblique bands, one below the eye and one behind the eye; (13) ventral surface of head and neck cream-coloured with black spots, gradually becoming entirely black posteriorly; (14) nine to ten pairs of nuchal glands, separated by a diastema from 116–118 pairs of dorsal glands (observed in two specimens); (15) hemipenis bilobed, bearing spines, extending to the level of the 12 th subcaudal; the bifurcation occurs at the level of the 10 th subcaudal (data from Bourret 1934; Zhu et al. 2014, 2020; this study). Description of the holotype of Natrix (Rhabdophis) angeli Bourret (Fig. 1) Habitus. Body elongate and cylindrical; head distinct from neck; snout moderately long; eyes large with rounded pupils; tail of moderate length, slender, and gradually tapering. Body size. SVL 358 mm, TaL 75 mm, TL 433 mm, TaL/TL ratio 0.173. Body scalation. Dorsal scale rows 15-15-15; dorsal scale rows feebly keeled, the outer most are smooth; 123 ventral scales, laterally slightly angulate; 42 subcaudals, paired and laterally slightly angulate; cloacal plate divided. Head scalation. Rostral wider than high, triangular, hardly visible from above; posterior rostral scale suture bordering internasals and forming a straight angle in dorsal view; nasal vertically divided by a furrow below and above the nostril; nostril large and lateral, piercing in a completely divided nasal; nasal surrounded by the first two supralabials, rostral, internasal, prefrontal, and loreal; internasals paired, anterior sutures slightly concave in dorsal view, in contact anteriorly with the rostral, and laterally with the nasal, followed by the prefrontal; each internasal slightly wider than long; prefrontals paired, large, subrectangular, and shorter than frontal; each prefrontal in contact with internasals, nasals, loreal, and frontal; supraoculars paired, subrectangularly shaped, posterior end of each scale slightly wider than anterior end; frontal small, hexagonal, shield-shaped, slightly longer than wide, tapering posteriorly; parietals paired, longer than wide; loreal 1/1, higher than longer, not in contact with the eye; preocular 1/1; subocular absent; postoculars 3/3, the uppermost scale slightly larger than the lowermost one; temporals 1+2; supralabials 5/5, the first and second in contact with the nasal, the second in contact with the loreal, and the second and third in contact with the eye, the fourth is the largest; infralabials 7/7, the first to fourth in contact with the anterior pair of chin shields; mental subtriangular in ventral profile, longer than wide; posterior chin shields equal in size relative to anterior shields. Colouration in preservative: Dorsal surface of the head and body ashy grey; top of head, occiput, and nape uniformly dark grey. A broad, black collar, approximately five dorsal scale rows wide, is present on the nape, posteriorly bordered by a reverse, V-shaped pale yellow zone approximately four scale rows wide. Narrow dorsolateral black cross-bars extend along the body and tail. A longitudinal brownish-red line is present on each side of the body and tail, running parallel to its contralateral counterpart and intersected by a series of white spots within the crossbars. Lips grey, with two distinct black oblique bands: one located below the eye and another situated behind the eye between the fourth and fifth supralabials. The ventral surface of the head and neck is cream-coloured with scattered black spots, gradually becoming entirely black toward the posterior. Variation (see Table 2 for the details). The longest known female specimen is 559 mm long (ZL-RG 2014-4-10; SVL 475 mm, TaL 84 mm). The longest known male is 435 mm long (SICAU 20160801-91; SVL 341 mm, TaL 94 mm). TaL/TL ratio 0.15–0.22 (without sexual dimorphism). Body scalation. DSR 15-15-15; VEN 118–127 (males 118–123; females 122–127); SC 38–47, without sexual dimorphism. Head scalation. SL 6/6, rarely 5/5 (1 specimen) or 5/6 (1 specimen); IL 8/8, rarely 7/7 (2 specimens) or 8/7 (1 specimen, unilateral). Loreal present, not touching the eye. PRO 1/1; PTO usually 3/3, rarely 2/2 (2 specimens) or 3/2 (1 specimen, unilateral). TEM is usually 1+1/1+1, rarely 1+2/1+2 (1 specimen) or 1+1/1+2 (2 specimens, unilateral). In these rare cases, an additional small posterior temporal is present, which may be counted either as 1+2 or as 1+1+1 depending on the counting system; here it is treated as 1+2. Dentition. Based on two specimens: MNHN-RA-1935.0059 data from Bourret (1934) and SYS r00018 data from Zhu et al. (2014): a total of 20–23 maxillary teeth, the posterior-most two or three maxillary teeth strongly enlarged, not separated by diastema from the rest of the series. Main characters of pattern (data from Bourret 1934, 1935; Zhu et al. 2014, 2022; and Fig. 4A–C). Dorsal surface brownish-grey; top of head, occiput, and nape grey; a broad black collar, approximately five scale rows wide, posteriorly bordered by a reverse V-shaped orange zone about four scale rows wide on the nape; 38–44 pairs of narrow dorsolateral black cross-bars along the body and 15 pairs on the tail; body and tail each bearing a longitudinal brownish-red line running parallel to the contralateral line, accompanied by a series of white spots within the crossbars; lips light grey, with two conspicuous black oblique bands, one situated below the eye and the other extending from behind the eye between the last two supralabial scales; ventral surface of the head and neck cream coloured with black spots, gradually becoming entirely black posteriorly. Comparisons. Rhabdophis angeli is phylogenetically placed within the Rhabdophis nuchalis species group and is morphologically most similar to other members of the R. nuchalis complex, including R. chiwen, R. hmongorum, R. kaiyuanensis, R. leonardi, R. nuchalis, R. pentasupralabialis, and R. swinhonis. Therefore, comparative analyses with these seven species are the most relevant for diagnostic purposes. The main morphological characters distinguishing Rhabdophis angeli from these congeners are summarised in Table 3 and illustrated in Fig. 4. Rhabdophis angeli is distinguished from R. chiwen (endemic to Sichuan Province, China) by having a lower number of VEN (118–127 vs. 151–159), a slightly lower number of SC (38–47 vs. 45–59), a higher number of SL (usually 6 vs. 5), and the presence of an orange V-shaped zone behind a black collar (vs. absent). Rhabdophis angeli is distinguished from R. hmongorum (distributed in Northern Vietnam, Northern Laos, and Yunnan Province, China) by having a lower number of DSR (15 vs. 17), a lower number of VEN (118–127 vs. 136– 151), a slightly lower number of SC (38–47 vs. 43–59), a lower number of TEM (usually 1+1 vs. 1+2), a slightly lower number of MT (20–23 vs. 25), the presence of an orange V-shaped zone behind the black collar (vs. absent), and the presence of two faint

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAmphibian and Reptile Biology→French-language works237,207→