Faster Fréchet distance approximation through truncated smoothing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Fréchet distance is a commonly used distance measure for curves. Computing the Fréchet distance between two polygonal curves of $n$ vertices takes roughly quadratic time, and conditional lower bounds suggest that approximating to within a factor $3$ cannot be done in strongly-subquadratic time, even in one dimension. Currently, one of the best approximation algorithms presents a trade-off between approximation quality and running time. Specifically, at SoCG 2021, Colombe and Fox presented an $O((n^3 / \alpha^2) \log n)$-time $\alpha$-approximate algorithm for curves in arbitrary dimensions, for any $\alpha \in [\sqrt{n}, n]$. In this work, we give an $\alpha$-approximate algorithm with a significantly faster running time of $O((n^2 / \alpha) \log n)$, for any $\alpha \in [1, n]$. In particular, we give the first strongly-subquadratic $n^\varepsilon$-approximation algorithm, for any constant $\varepsilon \in (0, 1/2]$. For curves in one dimension we further improve the running time to $O((n^2 / \alpha^3) \log^2 n)$, for $\alpha \in [1, n^{1/3}]$. Both of our algorithms rely on a linear-time simplification procedure that in one dimension reduces the complexity of the reachable free space to $O(n^2 / \alpha)$ without making sacrifices in the asymptotic approximation factor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".