MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7092398406 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17400954

Physics-Informed Hybrid Transformer with Uncertainty Quantification for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Turbofan Engines

2025· preprint· en· W7092398406 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpretabilityTurbofanTransformerEncoderUncertainty quantificationComponent (thermodynamics)Nonlinear systemRobustness (evolution)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Turbofan engines operate under demanding conditions where unexpected failures can lead to serious safety andeconomic consequences. Accurately estimating their Remaining Useful Life (RUL) is therefore essential for enablingpredictive maintenance and improving system reliability. Physics based approaches provide interpretability andconsistency but they often fall short when modeling the nonlinear and dynamic nature of engine degradation. On theother hand, purely data-driven deep learning models, including LSTM, TCN, and Transformer architectures, achieveimpressive accuracy but tend to overlook physical constraints and uncertainty awareness. To address these limitations,this study introduces a Physics-Informed Hybrid Transformer (Pi-HT) that combines physical knowledge with datadriven learning. The proposed hybrid model integrates a CNN component to capture localized temporal features anda Transformer encoder to model long-range dependencies across sensor sequences. This study has incorporateda physics-inspired degradation rate module to enforce monotonic RUL trends. Additionally, uncertainty quantificationtechniques—including negative log, quantile regression, and conformal calibration—were used to improve the reliabilityand interpretability of the model’s predictions. Experiments on the NASA C-MAPSS dataset show that Pi-HT achieveshigh predictive accuracy, with an R2 of 0.902 and an RMSE of 12.40, better performing over 1D CNN, LSTM, TCN, andTransformer baselines. Beyond accuracy improvements, the framework provides physically consistent and statisticallycalibrated estimates, making Pi-HT a practical and trustworthy tool for real-world prognostic health managementapplications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207