MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7092561178 · doi:10.17181/pdhh9-xq285

White Paper 2025

2025· report· W7092561178 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite (mutation)White paperFolioPortfolioWork (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2025 OQI Use Case White Paper first presents a full overview of the OQI port folio in Part I, featuring quantum computing use cases relevant to the SDGs that have been supported by OQI over the past three years. The portfolio includes use cases that were initiated during the incubation phase of OQI, while the majority started their journey during the OQI pilot. Second, the 2025 Use Case White Paper provides a deep dive in Part II into 7 new use cases developed by experts from 10 countries, who have started or refined their work with OQI support since the publication of the 2024 Edition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0110.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2980.247

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207