MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7092614083 · doi:10.17613/a4b7s-7rz22

"SO THAT EVERYONE IS BUILT UP": EXPLORING PAUL'S ETHICS OF "ΟΙΚΟΔΟΜΗ" IN 1 CORINTHIANS 12, 13, AND 14

2025· article· en· W7092614083 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiffusion and Search Dynamics
Canadian institutionsRegent College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Power (physics)Work (physics)Mode (computer interface)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The heart of this paper explores Paul's use of the language of οικοδομη, οικοδομεω ("building up, edifying") and concomitant imagery of the church as ναος of the Spirit, as Paul applies it in the context of the gathered church in 1 Corinthians 12 – 14. To get there, we will first highlight the Corinthian crisis and establish Paul's purposed use of οικοδομη language and temple imagery earlier in the letter. Then we will enter a "re-imagination" of οικοδομη for chapters 8 and 12 –14.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score0.912

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it