MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7092687567 · doi:10.57902/d7v010

UAS-Deployed programmable Tri-Frequency GPR Data Gathering Along the Alaskan Steese Highway 01/24: Providing Geospatial Resources for Extreme Cold Weather Infrastructure Analysis and Subsurface Visualization

2024· dataset· en· W7092687567 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCalifornia Digital Library · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeospatial analysisGround-penetrating radarPermafrostArcticExtreme weatherData collectionThe arcticVisualizationWeather station

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

GPR sensor data were collected on previous test sites that were tested during the summer field study exercise on Alaska's Steese Highway, as part of continued efforts to provide more geospatial data in Arctic regions relevant to cold region research. The Steese Highway is a major highway connecting the City of Fairbanks, Alaska, to the small town of Circle, Alaska, next to the Yukon River. The Steese Highway spans approximately 261 kilometers and is the only means of transportation for goods and supplies to the remote towns of both Central and Circle Alaska. The survey was conducted in January 2024 as a companion comparative dataset to the summer 2023 GPR dataset. The drone-flown GPR utilized three frequencies: 300 MHz, 150 MHz, and 100 MHz, to penetrate the ground in an effort to find the depth of permafrost in order to provide geospatial resources for extreme cold weather infrastructure analysis and subsurface visualization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCalifornia Digital LibrarySame topicClimate change and permafrostFrench-language works237,207