MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7092812258 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.10.043

Projective geometry in robust stabilization problems Part II: Möbius transformations

2025· article· en· W7092812258 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPolynomial and algebraic computation
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEquivalence (formal languages)FactorizationAlgebraic numberAlgebra over a fieldCoprime integersAlgebraic geometryRepresentation (politics)Ideal (ethics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Within the fractional representation approach, a fractional ideal can naturally be attached to a linear system defined by a transfer function. System properties are then reflected in the algebraic properties of this fractional ideal. Therefore, standard algebraic methods can be used to study system properties in detail. This paper studies the equivalence of systems corresponding to isomorphic associated fractional ideals. These natural equivalences bijectively transform a system into systems sharing the structural properties. This paper proves that these equivalences are defined by two kinds of Möbius transformations. Finally, this result is used to show how a stabilizing controller or a (weakly) coprime factorization is transformed by the application of these Möbius transformations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIFAC-PapersOnLineSame topicPolynomial and algebraic computationFrench-language works237,207