MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7093075994 · doi:10.5194/tc-19-4785-2025

Inferring inherent optical properties of sea ice using 360° camera radiance measurements

2025· article· en· W7093075994 on OpenAlexafffundabout

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œcryosphere · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaGovernment of CanadaPolarforskningssekretariatetCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNetworks of Centres of Excellence of CanadaCanada First Research Excellence FundArcticNet
KeywordsRadianceRadiative transferSea iceTerrainOptical depthAtmospheric radiative transfer codesInversion (geology)IrradianceScattering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. In this work, we demonstrate the utilization of a compact, consumer-grade 360° camera for measuring the in-ice spectral angular radiance distribution. This novel technique allows for the instantaneous acquisition of all radiometric quantities at a given depth with a non-intrusive probe. This gives the opportunity to monitor the light field structure (mean cosines) from the atmosphere to the underlying ocean beneath ice. In this study, we report vertical profiles of the light field geometric distribution measured at two sites representative of distinct ice types: High Arctic multi-year ice and Chaleur Bay (Quebec, Canada) landfast first-year ice. We also propose a technique to empirically retrieve the depth-resolved inherent optical properties by matching simulated profiles of spectral irradiances calculated with the HydroLight radiative transfer model to the observed ones. As reported in other studies, the derived reduced scattering coefficients were high (641.57 m−1; 72.85 m−1) at the top (2 cm; 5 cm) for both sites (High Arctic; Chaleur Bay) and lower in the interior part of the ice (0.48–4.10 m−1; 0.021–7.79 m−1). Due to the inherent underdetermined nature of the inversion problem, we emphasize the importance of using a similarity parameter that considers both the absorption and the reduced scattering coefficients. Finally, we believe that this radiometric device, combined with the proposed inversion technique, will allow the research community to scale up the measurements of the inherent optical properties of different kinds of sea ice, making it possible to take better account of terrain variability in radiative transfer models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œcryosphereSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207