MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7093078467 · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-1050-4_17

RL-Enhanced LLMs and Rechargeable Jamming Mines: Achieving Zero-Trust Security for Hierarchical Drone Swarms

2025· book-chapter· en· W7093078467 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJammingDroneExploitLeverage (statistics)Base stationChannel (broadcasting)Block (permutation group theory)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionSwarm behaviour

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This proposal introduces an innovative approach to achieving zero-trust anti-eavesdropping and anti-jamming capabilities in hierarchical drone swarms by employing reinforcement learning (RL) for boosting the potential of telecom-tuned on-device large language models (LLMs). We propose fine-tuning of on-device LLMs based on multi-modal data, including telecom-specific optimization algorithms for autonomous interference/jamming mitigation and anti-eavesdropping measures. To address the lack of emergent behavior in LLMs considering distributed collective intelligence paradigm, we propose a multi-agent RL (MARL) based approach to adaptively optimize policies based on real-time interactions. By treating the swarm of UXVs (i.e. drones) as ultra-dense networks (UDNs) with heterogeneous nodes such as fog or edge drones, we leverage MARL to exploit the inherent interference through optimum node association, resource block selection, and beam/power adjustment at each node. This efficiently mitigates interference at legitimate nodes while enhancing it elsewhere, adhering to a zero-trust approach by assuming eavesdroppers can be located anywhere. We also introduce the concept of rechargeable jamming mines (RJMs) onboard daughter or multi-role (edge) drones, which harvest energy from ambient radio frequency in the UDN environment. These RJMs are deployed and activated at strategic locations to create secure zones, maximizing the secure area around the drones by generating interference that disadvantages eavesdroppers, even with superior channel conditions. Our proposed approach has proven effective in typical UDN scenarios, where the MARL approach is used to optimize configuration settings at each base station, significantly enhancing secure area coverage. Furthermore, the solution is extendable for autonomous anti-jamming capabilities, allowing dynamic channel switching or transmission rate adaptation to mitigate jamming or interference. Our work aligns with the GENZERO24 vision of autonomous secure drone communication, offering robust protection against evolving threats and enhancing operational integrity in complex dynamic environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.574
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Filter Design and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207