A 3D INDOOR-OUTDOOR BENCHMARK DATASET FOR LoD3 BUILDING POINT CLOUD SEMANTIC SEGMENTATION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) algorithms require high quality training samples as well as accurate and thorough annotations to work effectively. Up until now a limited number of datasets are available to train DL techniques for semantic segmentation of 3D building point clouds, except a few ones focusing on specific categories of constructions (e.g., cultural heritage buildings). This paper presents a new 3D Indoor/Outdoor building dataset (BIO dataset), which is aimed to provide a highly accurate, detailed, and comprehensive dataset to be used for applications related to sematic classification of buildings based on point clouds and meshes. This benchmark dataset contains 100 building models generated from existing polygonal models and belonging to different categories. These include commercial buildings, residential houses, industrial and institutional buildings. Structural elements of buildings are annotated into 11 semantic categories, following standards from IFC and CityGML. To verify the applicability of the BIO dataset for the semantic segmentation task, it has been successfully tested by using one machine learning technique and four different DL algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".