MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7093087205 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17403588

Dataset for Climate-driven latitudinal divergence in lake phosphorus dynamics across Canada

2025· dataset· W7093087205 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typedataset
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWatershedBorealLatitudeLongitudeTemperate climateReflectivityDivergence (linguistics)Taiga

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset provides annual near-surface total phosphorus (TP) concentrations for Canadian lakes from 1984 to 2023, derived from Landsat surface reflectance imagery and TPNet model retrievals. It includes two data components: Grid_TP, containing the median lake surface TP for each of Canada's 3,329 grids (1° × 0.5°) with latitude (LAT) and longitude (LON) representing each grid's centroid; and Basin_TP, containing the median lake surface TP for each of Canada's 366 HydroBASINS Level-5 watersheds, with LAT and LON representing each watershed's centroid. Each watershed is uniquely identified by HYBAS_ID, which can be used to obtain its full boundary. BASIN_TYPE categorizes watersheds by land use: 1 for urban, 2 for agricultural, 3 for tundra, 4 for boreal forest, and 5 for temperate forest. TP concentrations are expressed in µg/L. The dataset also includes the pre-trained TPNet model (TPNet.pth), developed using the PyTorch framework, along with demo code (TPNet.py) to guide the estimation of near-surface TP from Landsat imagery. For any questions or suggestions regarding the dataset or model, please contact Hongwei Guo at guohw@chzu.edu.cn.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.010
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics→French-language works237,207→