Search strategies for Severe asthma remission in adults / Stratégies de recherche sur la Rémission de l'asthme sévère chez l'adulte
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dataset contains the full MEDLINE (using the MEDALL segment, 1946-) and Embase (from 1974-) search strategies. These databases were searched without language restriction, all via Ovid. The search strategy used text words and database-appropriate controlled vocabulary (indexing) to retrieve publications on moderate to severe asthma remission in adults. We retrieved results published later than 2014, when another search had been done. Ce jeu de données contient les stratégies de recherche complètes pour MEDALL (1946-) et Embase (1974-), toutes via Ovid. Nous avons cherché par mots-clés et par vocabulaire contrôllé propre à chaque base de données les concepts rémission, asthme modéré à sévère, et adulte. Nous n'avons pas mis une limite de langue, mais nous avons limité les résultats aux articles publiés après 2014, moment où une autre recherche a été faite.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.018 | 0.018 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".