MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7093298083 · doi:10.63209/2025.1595

Parcours de soins pharmaceutiques : idéal ou réalité? Le cas du Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine

2025· article· W7093298083 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmactuel · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Data collectionMEDLINEQualitative research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le système de santé québécois fait face à de nombreux défis, notamment en ce qui concerne les ressources humaines, financières et matérielles ainsi que les technologies et les processus 1 .Tous les jours, les grands médias relaient des manchettes relatives à des changements juridiques, à de nouvelles politiques de santé, à des pénuries de ressources et à des cas individuels mettant en évidence les difficultés d'accès aux soins et de trajectoires de soins 2 .Le domaine de la pharmacie n'y échappe pas 3 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.012
Scholarly communication0.0180.008
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmactuelSame topicHealth, Medicine and SocietyFrench-language works237,207