MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7093299396 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17418786

Apheloria corrugata Marek & Means & Hennen & Tingley 2025, new status

2025· article· W7093299396 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNomenclatureBiological sciencesNew englandNational museumNearctic ecozone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apheloria corrugata (Wood, 1864) new status Fontaria virginiensis (nec Gray, 1832; nec Drury & Westwood 1837; nec Wood, 1865; nec Bollman, 1888) C.L. Koch, 1847, in: Kritische Revision der Insectenfaune Deutschlands, 141. MALE? HT? (ZMB?). “North America”. Polydesmus (Fontaria) corrugatus Wood, 1864, Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 16: 6. MALE ST (USNM). United States: New York, Oneida County. Fontaria coriacea (nec C.L. Koch, 1847)—sensu Bollman, 1889a, Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 11: 406. See Hoffman (1957) for a discussion of the nomen dubium, Fontaria coriacea C.L. Koch, 1847. Fontaria butleriana Bollman, 1889, Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 11: 407. FEMALE HT (USNM). United States: Indiana, Franklin County. New synonymy. Leptocircus inexpectatus Attems, 1931, Zoologica, 30(79): 67, figs.102-104.MALE HT (NMW). “NorthAmerica”.Synonymized by Hoffman, 1999, Checklist: 307 (295 pdf). Apheloria inexpectata —Attems, 1938, Das Tierreich, 69: 169, fig. 186. Apheloria corrugata —Attems, 1938, Das Tierreich, 69: 170. Apheloria iowa Chamberlin, 1939, Bulletin of the University of Utah, 30(2): 10, fig. 28. MALE HT (USNM). United States: Iowa, Henry County. New synonymy. Apheloria adela Chamberlin, 1939, Bulletin of the University of Utah, 30(2): 10, fig. 34. MALE HT (USNM). United States: New York, Tompkins County. Synonymized with corrugata by Hoffman, 1957, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 70: 186. Apheloria reducta Chamberlin, 1939, Bulletin of the University of Utah, 30(2): 11, fig. 35. MALE HT (USNM). United States: Arkansas, Lawrence County. New synonymy. Apheloria pinicola Chamberlin, 1947, Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 99: 26, figs. 6, 7. MALE HT (ANSP). United States: Kentucky, Bell County. Synonymized with montana by Hoffman, 1999, Checklist: 305 (293 pdf), but clearly corrugata based on telopodite morphology and distribution. Apheloria asburna Chamberlin, 1949, Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 39: 101. MALE HT (USNM). United States: Tennessee, Davidson County. Synonymized with butleriana by Hoffman, 1999, Checklist: 307 (295 pdf). Apheloria coriacea —Hoffman, 1949b, American Museum Novitates 1405: 3, figs. 1-4. Misidentification of the name Fontaria coriacea Koch, 1847. Apheloria corrugata corrugata —Hoffman, 1957, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 70: 183. Apheloria corrugata butleriana —Hoffman, 1957, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 70: 186, footnote. Apheloria butleriana —Chamberlin & Hoffman, 1958, Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 212: 18. Apheloria (Apheloria) corrugata corrugata —Kevan, 1983, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 61(12): 2968. Apheloria virginiensis butleriana — Hoffman, 1999, Checklist: 307 (295 pdf). Apheloria virginiensis corrugata —Hoffman, 1999, Checklist: 307 (294 pdf). Apheloria virginiensis iowa —Hoffman, 1999, Checklist: 307 (295 pdf). Apheloria virginiensis reducta —Hoffman, 1999, Checklist: 307 (295 pdf). Apheloria “Clade B”—Marek & Bond 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(24): 9755.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionFrench-language works237,207