MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7093307176 · doi:10.17223/19988613/95/5

Lashmans and changes in the structure of Departmental management in the second quarter of the 19th century

2025· article· W7093307176 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Istoriya · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSoviet and Russian History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)EstateState (computer science)Government (linguistics)DutyJurisdictionPopulationControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article deals with a poorly studied topic of the Lashmans transferring from the State Department compe-tence under the Appanage Department management; Lashmans are a special social group of the population engaged in logging for the Russian fleet needs. The research is based mainly on archival sources stored in the Russian State Histori-cal Archive Fund of the Appanage Department (f. 515). Many sources are introduced into scientific circulation for the first time. In the second quarter of the 19th century the Imperial Court Ministry initiated territorial exchange between the Government and the Appanage Department for more compact concentration and administrative activities convenience. Such exchange was supposed to reduce the costs of Appanages properties managing that belonged to the members of the Imperial Family on the rights of conditional ownership. Many researchers consider that such exchange was beneficial to the Appanage Department, but it was unprofitable for the Government. During the territorial exchange not only real estate was transferred, but also peasants, lashmans, odnodvortsy and plowed soldiers living on these lands. The change in legal affiliation has brought to changes in the department management structure. The Lashmans have become the object of our research. Thus, the possibility of Lashmans transferring to appanage peasants was discussed. As a result, it was decided to preserve their social status. Formally they were under the control of the Appanage Department, but at the same time they carried out their duty to supply timber for the fleet needs. The Appanage authorities themselves paid the incomes and taxes for Lashmans to the treasury. Significant changes have touched the economy and life of Lash-mans. Firstly, they were obliged, like the rest of the peasants, to start a public plow to fill bread shops, and that caused an intense protest. Secondly, the control over the forests was established. The Lashmans understood the use of forests quite freely, that’s why they gradually cut them down for personal needs. The Appanage Department counted all the woodlands and put them on the Department balance. Now the Lashmans could not use the forest uncontrollably, as it was in the opinion of the local authorities before that. Thirdly, the vast majority of Lashmans were Muslims. Provokers appeared among them. They spread rumors and written documents about the forcible Lashman transferring to Orthodoxy and the prohibition of polygamy. All these reasons led to thousands of protests, which were stopped only with the help of military teams.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.574
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it