Sex-specific benefits of a combined supplementation of B vitamins, nicotinamide riboside, folate and cobalamin, in a murine model of heart failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Despite a substantial therapeutic arsenal to treat patients affected by heart failure (HF), no treatment specifically targets alterations of cardiac energy metabolism described in HF. Based on the results of previous studies demonstrating the cardiac preventive effects of B vitamins when introduced before inducing cardiac pressure overload in mice, we investigated the efficacy of a diet supplemented with a B vitamin cocktail (B3, B9 and B12 (3VitB)) to restore energy metabolism and improve cardiac function in an animal model of established HF. Four weeks after transverse aortic constriction (TAC) induction, male and female mice were treated with 3VitB. 3VitB increased life expectancy and reduced the TAC-induced alterations of cardiac parameters in males. Although these effects on survival and cardiac function were less clear in females due to their higher resistance to TAC, the 3VitB cocktail was beneficial in females as 8 weeks of treatment improved physical capacities and led to milder cardiomyocyte stress-induced hypertrophy in similar ways to those observed in males. In both sexes, 3VitB protected cardiac mitochondrial oxidative capacities, at least by supporting the process of mitochondrial biogenesis. Interestingly, our results revealed sex-specificities not only in response to cardiac pressure overload but also in response to 3VitB treatment. Overall, this study demonstrated the efficacy of 3VitB to preserved cardiac function and energy metabolism in an established HF model, especially in males that are more sensitive to cardiac pressure overload. This confers credit to vitamin supplementations and to metabolic therapy as new strategies to treat HF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".