MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7093347675 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvaf149.225

MON-467 Treatment Patterns and Changes in Health States in Patients with Classic Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: An Analysis of Data from the CAHtalog™ Registry

2025· article· en· W7093347675 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSexual Differentiation and Disorders
Canadian institutionsHealth Care Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCongenital adrenal hyperplasiaGlucocorticoidSpousePrednisoneDexamethasoneLongitudinal data

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Disclosure: G.S. Jeha: Full-time employee of Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. P.C. White: Recipient of sponsored research support from Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Diurnal Ltd (now Neurocrine UK Ltd) and has previously consulted for Neurocrine Biosciences. K. Lin-Su: None. D. Matos: None. F. Tang: Full-time employee of Cytel. H.S. Friedler: Full-time employee of Cytel. E. Roberts: Full-time employee of Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. H.K. Cheng: Full-time employee of Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. G.P. Sen: Full-time employee of Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. Background: Classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) often requires supraphysiologic glucocorticoid (GC) doses to reduce excess androgens. CAHtalog™ is an active US-based registry of patients with classic CAH developed in partnership with CARES Foundation on the PicnicHealth platform. Objective: To analyze treatment patterns and health states in patients in the CAHtalog registry. Methods: Medical records from pediatric (<18 yrs) and adult (≥18 yrs) patients in CAHtalog were abstracted into a deidentified database. GCs were summarized by type (hydrocortisone [HC], dexamethasone [DEX], prednisone [PRED]) and total daily GC dose in hydrocortisone equivalents. Due to the longitudinal nature of the registry, patients could be included in both age groups and multiple GC-treatment groups. Patients who took different GC types and doses over the observation period were counted in multiple categories. Health states for each patient were determined by matching GC records with the nearest androstenedione (A4) record (within the next 365 days). Based on the 95th percentile of cortisol production in healthy persons, GC doses were categorized as “higher” or “lower” (>11 or ≤11 mg/m2/d HCe) for the health state analysis. Based on the upper limit of normal (ULN) for age and sex, A4 was categorized as ≥ULN or <ULN. Transitions through health states based on GC dose (higher to lower, lower to higher) and A4 (≥ULN to <ULN, <ULN to ≥ULN) were analyzed in patients with ≥3 matched GC-A4 records. Results: Among 74 patients (37 adult; 51 pediatric; 14 both) with ≥1 medication record during the observation period, and without a standardized threshold or qualification of androgen control across individuals, the most common GC treatment (77.8% [adult]; 90.2% [pediatric]) at one point in their treatment journey was HC alone (mean±SD daily dose, 22.9±7.4 mg/d [adult]; 11.8±4.1 mg/m2/d [pediatric]), followed by DEX alone (47.2%; 35.1±18.4 mg/d) for adults. For pediatric patients, the next most common GC treatments after HC alone were DEX+HC (7.8%; 23.4±7.7 mg/m2/d) and PRED alone (7.8%, 12.6±9.8 mg/m2/d). Among 51 patients (20 adult; 33 pediatric; 2 both) with ≥3 matched GC-A4 records, health state transitions were observed across an age range of 0–67 yrs (median observation=6.1 yrs). Most (88.2%) patients had ≥1 health state transition and 64.7% had ≥3 health state transitions. Nearly all (98.0%) patients (with 76.5% of matched records) were prescribed higher GC doses and/or had A4 ≥ ULN at least once during their treatment journey. Conclusions: Longitudinal data from patients in the CAHtalog registry show various GC regimens and multiple transitions through health states characterized by higher GC doses and A4 ≥ULN, illustrating the lifelong balancing act between A4 management and GC dosing. These data also suggest that achievement of disease control today (A4 <ULN) does not predict maintenance of control tomorrow. Presentation: Monday, July 14, 2025

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.845

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicSexual Differentiation and DisordersFrench-language works237,207