MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7093376679 · doi:10.1302/1358-992x.2025.10.006

THE EFFECT OF THROMBOPROPHYLAXIS ON THE INCIDENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM FOLLOWING HIGH-ENERGY FRACTURES OF THE LOWER LEG: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

2025· article· en· W7093376679 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopaedic Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetrospective cohort studyPulmonary embolismIncidence (geometry)Deep veinThrombosisVenous thromboembolismAnkleCohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Venous thromboembolisms (VTE) (deep vein thrombosis [DVT] or pulmonary embolism [PE]) are frequent complications following high-energy fractures. In this context, VTEs are most often due to vascular injury and/or to immobilization. Post-operative thromboprophylaxis is recommended for patients presenting with a high-energy pelvic or hip fracture whereas patients with ankle and foot fractures do not need chemoprophylaxis. Guidelines are not as clear when it comes to patients presenting with high-energy fractures around then knee. The objective of this study was to describe the incidence of post-operative VTEs in patients admitted for high-energy fractures around the knee. We included in this retrospective cohort study all adult patients who underwent surgery for a high-energy fracture around the knee between 2011 and 2020 at (hospital name). Included fractures were of the femoral diaphysis; the distal femur; the proximal tibia; the tibial shaft; as well as knee dislocations. Patients presenting with fractures that required thromboprophylaxis or with a pathological fracture as well as patients under anticoagulation for a pre-existing condition were excluded from this study. Collected data concerned demographics, hospitalization and surgery dates, presence of VTE risk factors, thromboprophylaxis, and the occurrence of VTE following surgery were collected. We analyzed 985 patient files out of the 2217 identified. Seventy-three patients (7.4%) suffered a VTE (63 DVT, 17 PE), of which 59 (80%) had received some form of thromboprophylaxis. Patients who suffered a VTE were significantly older (52.3 vs 43.7 years old; p < 0 .0001) or had a previous history of either DVT or PE (p=0.0009). Twenty-nine had to have an external fixator prior to definitive fracture fixation (p < 0 .0001) and half were polytraumatized (p=0.04). Distal femur fractures were at higher risk of VTE (OR 2.19; 95% CI 1.18–4.09) In our cohort, patients more at risk of suffering from a VTE following surgery for high-energy lower leg fractures were significantly older; had a previous history of VTE; were polytraumatized; had to have an external fixator; or presented with a distal femur fracture. Most patients who suffered a VTE were under thromboprophylaxis. More aggressive thromboprophylaxis should be administered to high-risk patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopaedic ProceedingsSame topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementFrench-language works237,207