MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7093462521

Building it Green: European Report

2023· other· W7093462521 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWestminsterResearch (University of Westminster) · 2023
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEuropean unionDirectiveZero-energy buildingContext (archaeology)General partnershipWorkforceVocational educationMember state
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

8.2.5.FE Colleges 38 8.2.6.Regional authorities 41 8.2.7.Training, Qualifications, and Awarding Bodies 44 8.2.8.Considerations 45 8.3.Incorporating climate and energy literacy into construction VET 45 8.3.1.Building services 45 8.3.2.Insulation 47 8.3.3.Retrofit 48 8.3.4.Connectivity of occupations 48 8.3.5 New occupational profiles?49 8.3.6 Considerations 50 8.4.Barriers to embedding climate and energy literacy into the curriculum 49 8.4.1.Problems for FE College training 50 8.4.2Lack of interest in the industry in employing trained and qualified personnel 50 8.4.3 Procurement and policy requirements 50 8.4.4Other 51 8.5 Conclusion 51 9 Overall conclusions 51 10

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0610.053

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestminsterResearch (University of Westminster)French-language works237,207