MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7093500976

XVIIIème siècle  

2012· article· fr· W7093500976 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Canadian institutionsCanadian Bulletin of Medical History
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFocus (optics)Object (grammar)Natural (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

XVIIIème siècle Après le foisonnement de la production des siècles précédents, le XVIIIe siècle va nous paraître un peu terne dans le domaine de la gravure. Pourtant plusieurs pro­cédés vont apparaître alors, qui seront utilisés avec talent, mais rarement avec gé­nie. Peut-être existe-t-il une incompatibilité entre l’âpre difficulté des techniques de gravure et le caractère décoratif et mondain d’une bonne partie de la peinture de cette époque ? Il est d’ailleurs significatif de noter que des...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.068
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningFrench-language works237,207