Bibliographic record
Abstract
Döşemealtı is a large district which consists of 23 villages at the skirts of the Taurus Mountains in north Antalya. Dosemealtı rugs are Kovanlık, Aşağıoba, Killik, Ekşili, Karataş, Karaveliler. Although there is no carpets being made for the last 30 years, those are the carpet manufacturing centers where the best examples of carpets are made and reached out today.Döşemealtı carpets are made of wool and they are being made on either warp-weighted or vertical weaving looms which are called workbench or weave loom. 30x30, 30x40, 40x50 are the most common dimensions of carpets in the sizes of prayer rugs, floor carpets, runners, quarter carpets.Commonly used motifs are Halelli, toplu, yıldızlı, kocasulu, dallı, akrepli, ambarlı, albaysuyu, deve ve terazi toplu motifs. In the historical process of Döşemealtı carpets, the most beautiful examples of the region are exhibited in other museums of our country, especially in Antalya Museum. In these museums, the examples of the private collectors and the carpet shops in Kaleiçi were identified and the carpets were promoted by explaining the technical, raw material, color and motif names.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.071 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".