Latinoamericanos en el mosaico cultural canadiense
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La propuesta de este trabajo es reflexionar sobre el proceso migratorio de Canadá que, junto a Argentina y Estados Unidos, a fines del siglo XIX y comienzos del XX, fue receptor de masivos movimientos poblacionales, en especial, europeos. Cuando en 1971 se creó el Secretariado para el Multiculturalismo, este país imprimió en política inmigratoria un giro muy particular. El respeto por las identidades de los inmigrantes, la conservación de sus orígenes étnico-culturales en el contexto de la sociedad receptora, fue constituyendo un “mosaico cultural” en búsqueda constante del equilibrio social, que llega a nuestros días. Nos detendremos en la inmigración latinoamericana, su composición, las circunstancias nacionales que favorecieron su partida y las condiciones internas, del país, que actuaron como receptoras, en diferentes momentos y circunstancias. Diferenciaremos los flujos migratorios por razones económicas y los producidos por razones políticas, así como las zonas de asentamiento, que le otorgaron a dichos desplazamientos un perfil particular. Precisamente la problemática de los refugiados políticos generó en Canadá un protagonismo internacional que no tuvieron muchos países. En efecto, su política humanitaria lo posicionó como país receptor de contingentes de variados orígenes con políticas de Estado muy firmes al respecto. Los censos de población serán un aporte necesario para este análisis, para dar cuenta del aumento creciente del flujo latino e, inclusive, del posicionamiento del idioma español en la cultura receptora. Palabras clave: Flujos migratorios. Latinoamericanos. Canadá. Mosaico cultural. Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to discuss the immigration process in Canada which, as in Argentina and in the United States in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, was recipient of massive population movements, especially Europeans. When, in 1971, it was created the Secretariat for Multiculturalism, this country printed a very particular turn. Respect for identities of immigrants, preservation of their ethnic and cultural backgrounds in the context of the host society, was forming a "cultural mosaic", in constant search of social balance, which reaches to this days. We will hold us in the Latin American immigration, its composition, national circumstances that favored his departure and the internal conditions of the country, who acted as receiver, and different times and circumstances. We differentiate migration for economic reasons and those produced for political reasons, as well as settlement areas, which gave it to these shifts, a private profile. Precisely the problem of political refugees generated in Canada, an international role that many countries had not. Indeed, its humanitarian policy has positioned it as the host country of varied contingent origins with very firm state policy about it. Population census will be a necessary contribution to this analysis, to give science the increasing flow of Latin and even the position of the Spanish language in the receiving culture. Keywords: Migration flows. Latin Americans. Canada. Cultural mosaic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".