MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7093565883

ФÑндаменÑалÑнÑе аÑпекÑÑ Ð¾ÑÐ²Ð¾ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð½ÐµÑÑегазовÑÑ ÑеÑÑÑÑов аÑкÑиÑеÑкого ÑелÑÑа

2016· other· ru· W7093565883 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic scientific archive of UrFU (Ural Federal University) · 2016
Typeother
Languageru
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticThe arcticWork (physics)Oil explorationProcess (computing)Subject (documents)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work the object of research is the Arctic shelf, and the subject – the process of its development. The work purpose – the analysis of development of oil and gas resources of the Arctic shelf, identifying problems and prospects of development of the Arctic shelf. In the process of research was conducted comparative analysis of natural, technological and legal aspects of the Arctic shelf development not only Russia, but also Norway, Canada and the USA and also addressed the issue of oil and gas resources of the Arctic by the company OA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.349
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.004
Bibliometrics0.0110.008
Science and technology studies0.0050.011
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0110.004
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.049

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronic scientific archive of UrFU (Ural Federal University)French-language works237,207