MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7093640958

å®å¸¸è¶é³éè¡ææ³¢ä¸ã®é«å¯åº¦ã¬ã¹ã«ãããã¤ã³ãã©ã¤ãã»ãã¥ãªã³è§¦åªæ ¸èåã®æ¦å¿µ-ã¤ã³ãã©ã¤ãã»ãã¥ãªã³è§¦åªæ ¸èåã©ã ã¸ã§ããã¨ã³ã¸ã³ã®æ¦å¿µ

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicFusion and Plasma Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMuonNuclear fusionNeutronFusionNuclear reactionFusion powerIonDeuteriumRADIUS
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study was initiated for the purpose of eliminating long-life waste (LLFP) in nuclear reactors using fusion neutrons. Theoretical simulation studies have revealed that if nuclear fusion neutrons are irradiated to LLFP continuously for 10 years with the rating of 1019 cm-3 s-1, detoxification will proceed by transmutation. There is also a nuclear fusion reactor as a neutron source, but it is too large. The concept of In-flight Muon Catalysis Fusion has been proposed. Atom replaced by orbital electrons with negative muon has an atomic radius of 1/200, so the fusion cross section reaches 2000 barn at the d-t target. This reaction cross section is several hundred times larger than magnetic nuclear fusion using bare ions. Moreover, the kinetic energy of nuclei necessary for fusion is reduced from 100 keV to 1~2 keV. In order to utilize this muon fusion reaction, a mixture gas of deuterium and tritium at about 30 atm is targeted and irradiated with 10 keV muon particles. At the energy of α particles generated by this fusion (3.5 MeV), ions of 1~2 keV are generated in the target, and this ion and muon atom causes the next nuclear fusion reaction in a chain and steady state. This ion collides with the gas molecules in the target and disappears with a lifetime of about nanosecond, but the next ion is generated by new α particles generated in the next fusion reaction. The target is a high density neutral gas and does not need to be supported by a magnetic field. Since the target gas is overheated by the energy generated in the nuclear fusion reaction, the gas must be replaced at high speed. In the supersonic Laval nozzle, a high density Mach shock wave of 30 atm serves a nuclear fusion regime to which muons are injected. This supersonic nozzle replaces the gas combustion of the scramjet engine with nuclear fusion and has the potential to realize nuclear fusion within the range of existing technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0100.010
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.006
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0070.006
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2120.100

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFusion and Plasma Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207