Bibliographic record
Abstract
Revisioning Red Riding Hood Around the World: An Anthology of International Retellings. Edited by Sandra L. Beckett. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2014. 401 pp. (Reviewed by Victoria L. M. Harkavy, Independent Scholar) The Original Folk and Fairy Tales of the Brothers Grimm: The Complete First Edition. Translated and edited by Jack Zipes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014. xlv + 519 pp. The Original 1812 Grimm Fairy Tales: A New Translation of the 1812 First Edition Kinder- und Hausmärchen / Children’s and Household Tales, Collected Through the Brothers Grimm, Volume 1, 200 Year Anniversary Edition. Translated by Oliver Loo. Self-published, 2014. 607 pp. (Reviewed by Marc Pierce, University of Texas at Austin) Grimms’ Tales Around the Globe: The Dynamics of Their International Reception. Edited by Vanessa Joosen and Gillian Lathey. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2014. 312 pp. (Reviewed by Kirsten Møllegaard, University of Hawai’i, Hilo) Disability, Deformity, and Disease in the Grimms’ Fairy Tales. By Ann Schmiesing. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2014. 186 pp. (Reviewed by Sara Cleto, The Ohio State University) The Undiscovered Country: Text, Translation, and Modernity in the Work of Yanagita Kunio. By Melek Ortabasi. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014. 329 pp. (Reviewed by Fumihiko Kobayashi, North Bergen, New Jersey) Le Conte et l’image: L’illustration des contes de Grimm en Angleterre au XIXe siècle. By François Fièvre. Tours: Presses Universitaires François-Rabelais, 2013. 454 pp. (Reviewed by William Barker, Dalhousie University) The Idea of Nature in Disney Animation: From Snow White to WALL-E. By David Whitley. 2nd ed. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2012. 187 pp. (Reviewed by Jack Zipes, University of Minnesota) Into the Woods. Directed by Rob Marshall. Written by Stephen Sondheim and adapted by James Lapine. Walt Disney Pictures, 2014. Theatrical release. (Reviewed by S. Anne Wallace, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.445 | 0.381 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".