Bibliographic record
Abstract
This collection of essays explores representations and constructions of space and gender in Canadian women’s fiction and brings together a variety of theoretical approches, drawing on works by Nelly Arcan, Margaret Atwood, Dionne Brand, Nicole Brossard, Catherine Bush, Hiromi Goto, Anne Hébert, Marie Lafortune, Marlilú Mallet, Suzette Mayr, Tessa McWatt, Roxane Nadeau, Lilian Nattel, Gail Scott, Elise Turcotte, and Jane Urquhart. - Consacrés à la fiction canadienne au féminin, les essais réunis dans ce volume explorent des représentations et constructions spatiales en relation à la question du genre. Y sont analysées des œuvres de Nelly Arcan, Margaret Atwood, Dionne Brand, Nicole Brossard, Catherine Bush, Hiromi Goto, Anne Hébert, Marie Lafortune, Marlilú Mallet, Suzette Mayr, Tessa McWatt, Roxane Nadeau, Lilian Nattel, Gail Scott, Elise Turcotte et Jane Urquhart.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.980 | 0.925 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".